Kissinger wrote this NSSM 200 work that spoke of population control cutting down the numbers in other lands in order to dominate them. The U.N.’s UNFPA branch and Planned Parenthood International takes care of that. These are NWO brain-childs. The NWO types are usually white leaders who, over centuries, have looked down on the poor as “useless eaters” and resource drainers. They have their “useful idiots” like the Irrev.s Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Obama, who sell out their people for whatever. They make themselves apart from their people as they make nanny-states of countries usually south of the equatorial border. For these reasons, nothing will change under Obama, except that his worshippers around the world may enact some economy boosting measures in optimism (oddly placed in a man whose party’s affirmative action crippled the U.S. economy and are guilty of the muder of those born alive and of associating with domestic terrorists by association).
Regarding his domestic policies, we should be concerned about far more than his idioms, especially since we’re surrounded by socialist countries, some of whom persecute dissenters who are lambs (compared to Ayers and crew) as being as dangerous as terrorists. I think Pres. Bush was playing around with the idea of Ameros as currency for the Americas. That would have drained us. The Weather Underground would be proud. Obama just may do it.

That said, something Obama’s former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright recently said in an interview with Bill Moyers gives me hope that Obama does in fact understand how we need a new dialectic of global relations. Wright complained how “A lotta the missionaries were going to other countries assuming that our culture is superior, that you have no culture. And to be a Christian, you must be like us. Right now, you can go to Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and see Christians in 140-degree weather. They have to have on a tie. Because that’s what it means to be a Christian.”

Presently Obama may not be able to question the very framework that will get him elected in the coming months, but if his pastor really did have a significant impact on him we can indeed have hope, as Chris suggests, that he will begin to try once elected.

Obama’s speech patterns and choices of words have certainly moved toward the “center” of U.S. politics. However, I believe this to be more reflective of the realities of American politics than of any personal predilictions on Obama’s part. In order to get elected, he must speak, first and foremost, to a broad swath of U.S. voters. I believe he WILL bring change in U.S. foreign policies, but it will need to be gradual, and will begin with his election to the presidency. And that will, unfortunately, take a bit word-mincing with the American public, much of which is a bit behind the curve on ideas you correctly express here. For it is they, and not the international community, who will cast votes.

Observe his words and actions AFTER the election – that will be a far better indicator than the current sound bytes that are hopelessly distorted by the U.S. electoral process. I have no idea whether he will or will not represent good change in the end – but he has been our best hope yet, and I’m betting on him. That said, I certainly do hope he ends up holding to the principles you profess in this blog post – we are on the same page there!

Best
Chris